背景
公司有个渠道系统，专门对接三方渠道使用，没有什么业务逻辑，主要是转换报文和参数校验之类的工作，起着一个承上启下的作用。
最近在优化接口的响应时间，优化了代码之后，但是时间还是达不到要求；有一个诡异的100ms左右的耗时问题，在接口中打印了请求处理时间后，和调用方的响应时间还有差了100ms左右。比如程序里记录150ms，但是调用方等待时间却为250ms左右。
下面记录下当时详细的定位&解决流程（其实解决很简单，关键在于怎么定位并找到解决问题的方法）
定位过程
分析代码
渠道系统是一个常见的spring-boot web工程，使用了集成的tomcat。分析了代码之后，发现并没有特殊的地方，没有特殊的过滤器或者拦截器，所以初步排除是业务代码问题
分析调用流程
出现这个问题之后，首先确认了下接口的调用流程。由于是内部测试，所以调用流程较少。
Nginx -反向代理-> 渠道系统
公司是云服务器，网络走的也是云的内网。由于不明确问题的原因，所以用排除法，首先确认服务器网络是否有问题。
先确认发送端到Nginx Host是否有问题：
[jboss@VM_0_139_centos ~]$ ping 10.0.0.139
PING 10.0.0.139 (10.0.0.139) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.0.0.139: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.029 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.139: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.041 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.139: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.040 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.139: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.040 ms
从ping结果上看，发送端到Nginx主机的延迟是无问题的，接下来查看Nginx到渠道系统的网络。
# 由于日志是没问题的，这里直接复制上面日志了
[jboss@VM_0_139_centos ~]$ ping 10.0.0.139
PING 10.0.0.139 (10.0.0.139) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.0.0.139: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.029 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.139: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.041 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.139: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.040 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.139: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.040 ms
从ping结果上看，Nginx到渠道系统服务器网络延迟也是没问题的
既然网络看似没问题，那么可以继续排除法，砍掉Nginx，客户端直接再渠道系统的服务器上，通过回环地址（localhost）直连，避免经过网卡/dns，缩小问题范围看看能否复现（这个应用和地址是我后期模拟的，测试的是一个空接口）：
[jboss@VM_10_91_centos tmp]$ curl -w “@curl-time.txt” http://127.0.0.1:7744/send
success
http: 200
dns: 0.001s
redirect: 0.000s
time_connect: 0.001s
time_appconnect: 0.000s
time_pretransfer: 0.001s
time_starttransfer: 0.073s
size_download: 7bytes
speed_download: 95.000B/s
———-
time_total: 0.073s 请求总耗时
从curl日志上看，通过回环地址调用一个空接口耗时也有73ms。这就奇怪了，跳过了中间所有调用节点（包括过滤器&拦截器之类），直接请求应用一个空接口，都有73ms的耗时，再请求一次看看：
[jboss@VM_10_91_centos tmp]$ curl -w “@curl-time.txt” http://127.0.0.1:7744/send
success
http: 200
dns: 0.001s
redirect: 0.000s
time_connect: 0.001s
time_appconnect: 0.000s
time_pretransfer: 0.001s
time_starttransfer: 0.003s
size_download: 7bytes
speed_download: 2611.000B/s
———-
time_total: 0.003s
更奇怪的是，第二次请求耗时就正常了，变成了3ms。经查阅资料，linux curl是默认开启http keep-alive的。就算不开启keep-alive，每次重新handshake，也不至于需要70ms。
经过不断分析测试发现，连续请求的话时间就会很短，每次请求只需要几毫秒，但是如果隔一段时间再请求，就会花费70ms以上。
从这个现象猜想，可能是某些缓存机制导致的，连续请求因为有缓存，所以速度快，时间长缓存失效后导致时间长。
那么这个问题点到底在哪一层呢？tomcat层还是spring-webmvc呢？
光猜想定位不了问题，还是得实际测试一下，把渠道系统的代码放到本地ide里启动测试能否复现
但是导入本地Ide后，在Ide中启动后并不能复现问题，并没有70+ms的延迟问题。这下头疼了，本地无法复现，不能Debug，由于问题点不在业务代码，也不能通过加日志的方式来Debug
这时候可以祭出神器Arthas了
Arthas分析问题
Arthas 是Alibaba开源的Java诊断工具，深受开发者喜爱。
当你遇到以下类似问题而束手无策时，Arthas可以帮助你解决：
- 这个类从哪个 jar 包加载的？为什么会报各种类相关的 Exception？
- 我改的代码为什么没有执行到？难道是我没 commit？分支搞错了？
- 遇到问题无法在线上 debug，难道只能通过加日志再重新发布吗？
- 线上遇到某个用户的数据处理有问题，但线上同样无法 debug，线下无法重现！
- 是否有一个全局视角来查看系统的运行状况？
- 有什么办法可以监控到JVM的实时运行状态？
上面是Arthas的官方简介，这次我只需要用他的一个小功能trace。动态计算方法调用路径和时间，这样我就可以定位时间在哪个地方被消耗了。
- trace 方法内部调用路径，并输出方法路径上的每个节点上耗时
- trace 命令能主动搜索 class-pattern／method-pattern
- 对应的方法调用路径，渲染和统计整个调用链路上的所有性能开销和追踪调用链路。
有了神器，那么该追踪什么方法呢？由于我对Tomcat源码不是很熟，所以只能从spring mvc下手，先来trace一下spring mvc的入口：
[arthas@24851]$ trace org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet *
Press Q or Ctrl+C to abort.
Affect(class-cnt:1 , method-cnt:44) cost in 508 ms.
`—ts=2019-09-14 21:07:44;thread_name=http-nio-7744-exec-2;id=11;is_daemon=true;priority=5;TCCL=org.springframework.boot.web.embedded.tomcat.TomcatEmbeddedWebappClassLoader@7c136917
`—[2.952142ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:buildLocaleContext()
`—ts=2019-09-14 21:07:44;thread_name=http-nio-7744-exec-2;id=11;is_daemon=true;priority=5;TCCL=org.springframework.boot.web.embedded.tomcat.TomcatEmbeddedWebappClassLoader@7c136917
`—[18.08903ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:doService()
+—[0.041346ms] org.apache.commons.logging.Log:isDebugEnabled() #889
+—[0.022398ms] org.springframework.web.util.WebUtils:isIncludeRequest() #898
+—[0.014904ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:getWebApplicationContext() #910
+—[1.071879ms] javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest:setAttribute() #910
+—[0.020977ms] javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest:setAttribute() #911
+—[0.017073ms] javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest:setAttribute() #912
+—[0.218277ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:getThemeSource() #913
| `—[0.137568ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:getThemeSource()
| `—[min=0.00783ms,max=0.014251ms,total=0.022081ms,count=2] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:getWebApplicationContext() #782
+—[0.019363ms] javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest:setAttribute() #913
+—[0.070694ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.FlashMapManager:retrieveAndUpdate() #916
+—[0.01839ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.FlashMap:<init>() #920
+—[0.016943ms] javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest:setAttribute() #920
+—[0.015268ms] javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest:setAttribute() #921
+—[15.050124ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:doDispatch() #925
| `—[14.943477ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:doDispatch()
| +—[0.019135ms] org.springframework.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncUtils:getAsyncManager() #953
| +—[2.108373ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:checkMultipart() #960
| | `—[2.004436ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:checkMultipart()
| | `—[1.890845ms] org.springframework.web.multipart.MultipartResolver:isMultipart() #1117
| +—[2.054361ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:getHandler() #964
| | `—[1.961963ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:getHandler()
| | +—[0.02051ms] java.util.List:iterator() #1183
| | +—[min=0.003805ms,max=0.009641ms,total=0.013446ms,count=2] java.util.Iterator:hasNext() #1183
| | +—[min=0.003181ms,max=0.009751ms,total=0.012932ms,count=2] java.util.Iterator:next() #1183
| | +—[min=0.005841ms,max=0.015308ms,total=0.021149ms,count=2] org.apache.commons.logging.Log:isTraceEnabled() #1184
| | `—[min=0.474739ms,max=1.19145ms,total=1.666189ms,count=2] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerMapping:getHandler() #1188
| +—[0.013071ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerExecutionChain:getHandler() #971
| +—[0.372236ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:getHandlerAdapter() #971
| | `—[0.280073ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:getHandlerAdapter()
| | +—[0.004804ms] java.util.List:iterator() #1224
| | +—[0.003668ms] java.util.Iterator:hasNext() #1224
| | +—[0.003038ms] java.util.Iterator:next() #1224
| | +—[0.006451ms] org.apache.commons.logging.Log:isTraceEnabled() #1225
| | `—[0.012683ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerAdapter:supports() #1228
| +—[0.012848ms] javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest:getMethod() #974
| +—[0.013132ms] java.lang.String:equals() #975
| +—[0.003025ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerExecutionChain:getHandler() #977
| +—[0.008095ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerAdapter:getLastModified() #977
| +—[0.006596ms] org.apache.commons.logging.Log:isDebugEnabled() #978
| +—[0.018024ms] org.springframework.web.context.request.ServletWebRequest:<init>() #981
| +—[0.017869ms] org.springframework.web.context.request.ServletWebRequest:checkNotModified() #981
| +—[0.038542ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerExecutionChain:applyPreHandle() #986
| +—[0.00431ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerExecutionChain:getHandler() #991
| +—[4.248493ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerAdapter:handle() #991
| +—[0.014805ms] org.springframework.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncManager:isConcurrentHandlingStarted() #993
| +—[1.444994ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:applyDefaultViewName() #997
| | `—[0.067631ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:applyDefaultViewName()
| +—[0.012027ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerExecutionChain:applyPostHandle() #998
| +—[0.373997ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:processDispatchResult() #1008
| | `—[0.197004ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet:processDispatchResult()
| | +—[0.007074ms] org.apache.commons.logging.Log:isDebugEnabled() #1075
| | +—[0.005467ms] org.springframework.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncUtils:getAsyncManager() #1081
| | +—[0.004054ms] org.springframework.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncManager:isConcurrentHandlingStarted() #1081
| | `—[0.011988ms] org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerExecutionChain:triggerAfterCompletion() #1087
| `—[0.004015ms] org.springframework.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncManager:isConcurrentHandlingStarted() #1018
+—[0.005055ms] org.springframework.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncUtils:getAsyncManager() #928
`—[0.003422ms] org.springframework.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncManager:isConcurrentHandlingStarted() #928
[jboss@VM_10_91_centos tmp]$ curl -w “@curl-time.txt” http://127.0.0.1:7744/send
success
http: 200
dns: 0.001s
redirect: 0.000s
time_connect: 0.001s
time_appconnect: 0.000s
time_pretransfer: 0.001s
time_starttransfer: 0.115s
size_download: 7bytes
speed_download: 60.000B/s
———-
time_total: 0.115s
本次调用，调用端时间花费115ms，但是从arthas trace上看，spring mvc只消耗了18ms，那么剩下的97ms去哪了呢？
本地测试后已经可以排除spring mvc的问题了，最后也是唯一可能出问题的点就是tomcat
可是本人并不熟悉tomcat中的源码，就连请求入口都不清楚，tomcat里需要trace的类都不好找。。。
不过没关系，有神器Arthas，可以通过stack命令来反向查找调用路径，以org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet作为参数：
- stack 输出当前方法被调用的调用路径
很多时候我们都知道一个方法被执行，但这个方法被执行的路径非常多，或者你根本就不知道这个方法是从那里被执行了，此时你需要的是 stack 命令。
[arthas@24851]$ stack org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet *
Press Q or Ctrl+C to abort.
Affect(class-cnt:1 , method-cnt:44) cost in 495 ms.
ts=2019-09-14 21:15:19;thread_name=http-nio-7744-exec-5;id=14;is_daemon=true;priority=5;TCCL=org.springframework.boot.web.embedded.tomcat.TomcatEmbeddedWebappClassLoader@7c136917
@org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.processRequest()
at org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.doGet(FrameworkServlet.java:866)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:635)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.service(FrameworkServlet.java:851)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:742)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:231)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:52)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.springframework.web.filter.RequestContextFilter.doFilterInternal(RequestContextFilter.java:99)
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.springframework.web.filter.HttpPutFormContentFilter.doFilterInternal(HttpPutFormContentFilter.java:109)
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.springframework.web.filter.HiddenHttpMethodFilter.doFilterInternal(HiddenHttpMethodFilter.java:81)
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.springframework.web.filter.CharacterEncodingFilter.doFilterInternal(CharacterEncodingFilter.java:200)
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:198)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:96)
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:496)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:140)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:81)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:87)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:342)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:803)
at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:66)
at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:790)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1468)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
ts=2019-09-14 21:15:19;thread_name=http-nio-7744-exec-5;id=14;is_daemon=true;priority=5;TCCL=org.springframework.boot.web.embedded.tomcat.TomcatEmbeddedWebappClassLoader@7c136917
@org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doService()
at org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.processRequest(FrameworkServlet.java:974)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.doGet(FrameworkServlet.java:866)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:635)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.service(FrameworkServlet.java:851)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:742)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:231)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:52)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.springframework.web.filter.RequestContextFilter.doFilterInternal(RequestContextFilter.java:99)
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.springframework.web.filter.HttpPutFormContentFilter.doFilterInternal(HttpPutFormContentFilter.java:109)
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.springframework.web.filter.HiddenHttpMethodFilter.doFilterInternal(HiddenHttpMethodFilter.java:81)
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.springframework.web.filter.CharacterEncodingFilter.doFilterInternal(CharacterEncodingFilter.java:200)
at org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:107)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:166)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:198)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:96)
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:496)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:140)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:81)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:87)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:342)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:803)
at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:66)
at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:790)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1468)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
从stack日志上可以很直观的看出DispatchServlet的调用栈，那么这么长的路径，该trace哪个类呢（这里跳过spring mvc中的过滤器的trace过程，实际排查的时候也trace了一遍，但这诡异的时间消耗不是由这里过滤器产生的）？
有一定经验的老司机从名字上大概也能猜出来从哪里下手比较好，那就是org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service，从名字上看，http1处理器，这可能是一个比较好的切入点。
下面来trace一下：
[arthas@24851]$ trace org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor service
Press Q or Ctrl+C to abort.
Affect(class-cnt:1 , method-cnt:1) cost in 269 ms.
`—ts=2019-09-14 21:22:51;thread_name=http-nio-7744-exec-8;id=17;is_daemon=true;priority=5;TCCL=org.springframework.boot.loader.LaunchedURLClassLoader@20ad9418
`—[131.650285ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:service()
+—[0.036851ms] org.apache.coyote.Request:getRequestProcessor() #667
+—[0.009986ms] org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo:setStage() #668
+—[0.008928ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:setSocketWrapper() #671
+—[0.013236ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11InputBuffer:init() #672
+—[0.00981ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11OutputBuffer:init() #673
+—[min=0.00213ms,max=0.007317ms,total=0.009447ms,count=2] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:getErrorState() #683
+—[min=0.002098ms,max=0.008888ms,total=0.010986ms,count=2] org.apache.coyote.ErrorState:isError() #683
+—[min=0.002448ms,max=0.007149ms,total=0.009597ms,count=2] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:isAsync() #683
+—[min=0.002399ms,max=0.00852ms,total=0.010919ms,count=2] org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AbstractEndpoint:isPaused() #683
+—[min=0.033587ms,max=0.11832ms,total=0.151907ms,count=2] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11InputBuffer:parseRequestLine() #687
+—[0.005384ms] org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AbstractEndpoint:isPaused() #695
+—[0.007924ms] org.apache.coyote.Request:getMimeHeaders() #702
+—[0.006744ms] org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AbstractEndpoint:getMaxHeaderCount() #702
+—[0.012574ms] org.apache.tomcat.util.http.MimeHeaders:setLimit() #702
+—[0.14319ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11InputBuffer:parseHeaders() #703
+—[0.003997ms] org.apache.coyote.Request:getMimeHeaders() #743
+—[0.026561ms] org.apache.tomcat.util.http.MimeHeaders:values() #743
+—[min=0.002869ms,max=0.01203ms,total=0.014899ms,count=2] java.util.Enumeration:hasMoreElements() #745
+—[0.070114ms] java.util.Enumeration:nextElement() #746
+—[0.010921ms] java.lang.String:toLowerCase() #746
+—[0.008453ms] java.lang.String:contains() #746
+—[0.002698ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:getErrorState() #775
+—[0.00307ms] org.apache.coyote.ErrorState:isError() #775
+—[0.002708ms] org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo:setStage() #777
+—[0.171139ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:prepareRequest() #779
+—[0.009349ms] org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketWrapperBase:decrementKeepAlive() #794
+—[0.002574ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:getErrorState() #800
+—[0.002696ms] org.apache.coyote.ErrorState:isError() #800
+—[0.002499ms] org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo:setStage() #802
+—[0.005641ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:getAdapter() #803
+—[129.868916ms] org.apache.coyote.Adapter:service() #803
+—[0.003859ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:getErrorState() #809
+—[0.002365ms] org.apache.coyote.ErrorState:isError() #809
+—[0.003844ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:isAsync() #809
+—[0.002382ms] org.apache.coyote.Response:getStatus() #809
+—[0.002476ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:statusDropsConnection() #809
+—[0.002284ms] org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo:setStage() #838
+—[0.00222ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:isAsync() #839
+—[0.037873ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:endRequest() #843
+—[0.002188ms] org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo:setStage() #845
+—[0.002112ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:getErrorState() #849
+—[0.002063ms] org.apache.coyote.ErrorState:isError() #849
+—[0.002504ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:isAsync() #853
+—[0.009808ms] org.apache.coyote.Request:updateCounters() #854
+—[0.002008ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:getErrorState() #855
+—[0.002192ms] org.apache.coyote.ErrorState:isIoAllowed() #855
+—[0.01968ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11InputBuffer:nextRequest() #856
+—[0.010065ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11OutputBuffer:nextRequest() #857
+—[0.002576ms] org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo:setStage() #870
+—[0.016599ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:processSendfile() #872
+—[0.008182ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11InputBuffer:getParsingRequestLinePhase() #688
+—[0.0075ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:handleIncompleteRequestLineRead() #690
+—[0.001979ms] org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo:setStage() #875
+—[0.001981ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:getErrorState() #877
+—[0.001934ms] org.apache.coyote.ErrorState:isError() #877
+—[0.001995ms] org.apache.tomcat.util.net.AbstractEndpoint:isPaused() #877
+—[0.002403ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:isAsync() #879
`—[0.006176ms] org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor:isUpgrade() #881
日志里有一个129ms的耗时点（时间比没开arthas的时候更长是因为arthas本身带来的性能消耗，所以生产环境小心使用），这个就是要找的问题点。
打问题点找到了，那怎么定位是什么导致的问题呢，又如何解决呢？
继续trace吧，细化到具体的代码块或者内容。trace由于性能考虑，不会展示所有的调用路径，如果调用路径过深，只有手动深入trace，原则就是trace耗时长的那个方法：
[arthas@24851]$ trace org.apache.coyote.Adapter service
Press Q or Ctrl+C to abort.
Affect(class-cnt:1 , method-cnt:1) cost in 608 ms.
`—ts=2019-09-14 21:34:33;thread_name=http-nio-7744-exec-1;id=10;is_daemon=true;priority=5;TCCL=org.springframework.boot.loader.LaunchedURLClassLoader@20ad9418
`—[81.70999ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter:service()
+—[0.032546ms] org.apache.coyote.Request:getNote() #302
+—[0.007148ms] org.apache.coyote.Response:getNote() #303
+—[0.007475ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Connector:getXpoweredBy() #324
+—[0.00447ms] org.apache.coyote.Request:getRequestProcessor() #331
+—[0.007902ms] java.lang.ThreadLocal:get() #331
+—[0.006522ms] org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo:setWorkerThreadName() #331
+—[73.793798ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter:postParseRequest() #336
+—[0.001536ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Connector:getService() #339
+—[0.004469ms] org.apache.catalina.Service:getContainer() #339
+—[0.007074ms] org.apache.catalina.Engine:getPipeline() #339
+—[0.004334ms] org.apache.catalina.Pipeline:isAsyncSupported() #339
+—[0.002466ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Request:setAsyncSupported() #339
+—[6.01E-4ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Connector:getService() #342
+—[0.001859ms] org.apache.catalina.Service:getContainer() #342
+—[9.65E-4ms] org.apache.catalina.Engine:getPipeline() #342
+—[0.005231ms] org.apache.catalina.Pipeline:getFirst() #342
+—[7.239154ms] org.apache.catalina.Valve:invoke() #342
+—[0.006904ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Request:isAsync() #345
+—[0.00509ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Request:finishRequest() #372
+—[0.051461ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Response:finishResponse() #373
+—[0.007244ms] java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean:<init>() #379
+—[0.007314ms] org.apache.coyote.Response:action() #380
+—[0.004518ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Request:isAsyncCompleting() #382
+—[0.001072ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Request:getContext() #394
+—[0.007166ms] java.lang.System:currentTimeMillis() #401
+—[0.004367ms] org.apache.coyote.Request:getStartTime() #401
+—[0.011483ms] org.apache.catalina.Context:logAccess() #401
+—[0.0014ms] org.apache.coyote.Request:getRequestProcessor() #406
+—[min=8.0E-4ms,max=9.22E-4ms,total=0.001722ms,count=2] java.lang.Integer:<init>() #406
+—[0.001082ms] java.lang.reflect.Method:invoke() #406
+—[0.001851ms] org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo:setWorkerThreadName() #406
+—[0.035805ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Request:recycle() #410
`—[0.007849ms] org.apache.catalina.connector.Response:recycle() #411
一段无聊的手动深入trace之后………………
[arthas@24851]$ trace org.apache.catalina.webresources.AbstractArchiveResourceSet getArchiveEntries
Press Q or Ctrl+C to abort.
Affect(class-cnt:4 , method-cnt:2) cost in 150 ms.
`—ts=2019-09-14 21:36:26;thread_name=http-nio-7744-exec-3;id=12;is_daemon=true;priority=5;TCCL=org.springframework.boot.loader.LaunchedURLClassLoader@20ad9418
`—[75.743681ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.JarWarResourceSet:getArchiveEntries()
+—[0.025731ms] java.util.HashMap:<init>() #106
+—[0.097729ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.JarWarResourceSet:openJarFile() #109
+—[0.091037ms] java.util.jar.JarFile:getJarEntry() #110
+—[0.096325ms] java.util.jar.JarFile:getInputStream() #111
+—[0.451916ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:<init>() #113
+—[min=0.001175ms,max=0.001176ms,total=0.002351ms,count=2] java.lang.Integer:<init>() #114
+—[0.00104ms] java.lang.reflect.Method:invoke() #114
+—[0.045105ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:getNextJarEntry() #114
+—[min=5.02E-4ms,max=0.008531ms,total=0.028864ms,count=31] java.util.jar.JarEntry:getName() #116
+—[min=5.39E-4ms,max=0.022805ms,total=0.054647ms,count=31] java.util.HashMap:put() #116
+—[min=0.004452ms,max=34.479307ms,total=74.206249ms,count=31] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:getNextJarEntry() #117
+—[0.018358ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:getManifest() #119
+—[0.006429ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.JarWarResourceSet:setManifest() #120
+—[0.010904ms] org.apache.tomcat.util.compat.JreCompat:isJre9Available() #121
+—[0.003307ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:getMetaInfEntry() #133
+—[5.5E-4ms] java.util.jar.JarEntry:getName() #135
+—[6.42E-4ms] java.util.HashMap:put() #135
+—[0.001981ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:getManifestEntry() #137
+—[0.064484ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:close() #141
+—[0.007961ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.JarWarResourceSet:closeJarFile() #151
`—[0.004643ms] java.io.InputStream:close() #155
发现了一个值得暂停思考的点：
+—[min=0.004452ms,max=34.479307ms,total=74.206249ms,count=31] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:getNextJarEntry() #117
这行代码加载了31次，一共耗时74ms；从名字上看，应该是tomcat加载jar包时的耗时，那么是加载了31个jar包的耗时，还是加载了jar包内的某些资源31次耗时呢？
TomcatJarInputStream这个类源码的注释写到：
The purpose of this sub-class is to obtain references to the JarEntry objectsfor META-INF/ and META-INF/MANIFEST.MF that are otherwise swallowed by theJarInputStream implementation.
大概意思也就是，获取jar包内META-INF/，META-INF/MANIFEST的资源，这是一个子类，更多的功能在父类JarInputStream里。
其实看到这里大概也能猜到问题了，tomcat加载jar包内META-INF/，META-INF/MANIFEST的资源导致的耗时，至于为什么连续请求不会耗时，应该是tomcat的缓存机制（下面介绍源码分析）
不着急定位问题，试着通过Arthas最终定位问题细节，继续手动深入trace
[arthas@24851]$ trace org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream *
Press Q or Ctrl+C to abort.
Affect(class-cnt:1 , method-cnt:4) cost in 44 ms.
`—ts=2019-09-14 21:37:47;thread_name=http-nio-7744-exec-5;id=14;is_daemon=true;priority=5;TCCL=org.springframework.boot.loader.LaunchedURLClassLoader@20ad9418
`—[0.234952ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:createZipEntry()
+—[0.039455ms] java.util.jar.JarInputStream:createZipEntry() #43
`—[0.007827ms] java.lang.String:equals() #44
`—ts=2019-09-14 21:37:47;thread_name=http-nio-7744-exec-5;id=14;is_daemon=true;priority=5;TCCL=org.springframework.boot.loader.LaunchedURLClassLoader@20ad9418
`—[0.050222ms] org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream:createZipEntry()
+—[0.001889ms] java.util.jar.JarInputStream:createZipEntry() #43
`—[0.001643ms] java.lang.String:equals() #46
#这里一共31个trace日志，删减了剩下的
从方法名上看，还是加载资源之类的意思。都已经到jdk源码了，这时候来看一下TomcatJarInputStream这个类的源码:
/**
* Creates a new <code>JarEntry</code> (<code>ZipEntry</code>) for the
* specified JAR file entry name. The manifest attributes of
* the specified JAR file entry name will be copied to the new
* <CODE>JarEntry</CODE>.
*
* @param name the name of the JAR/ZIP file entry
* @return the <code>JarEntry</code> object just created
*/
protected ZipEntry createZipEntry(String name) {
JarEntry e = new JarEntry(name);
if (man != null) {
e.attr = man.getAttributes(name);
}
return e;
}
这个createZipEntry有个name参数，从注释上看，是jar/zip文件名，如果能得到文件名这种关键信息，就可以直接定位问题了；还是通过Arthas，使用watch命令，动态监测方法调用数据
watch方法执行数据观测
让你能方便的观察到指定方法的调用情况。能观察到的范围为：返回值、抛出异常、入参，通过编写 OGNL 表达式进行对应变量的查看。
watch 该方法的入参
[arthas@24851]$ watch org.apache.catalina.webresources.TomcatJarInputStream createZipEntry “{params[0]}”
Press Q or Ctrl+C to abort.
Affect(class-cnt:1 , method-cnt:1) cost in 27 ms.
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.14547ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.048028ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/MANIFEST.MF],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.046071ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/resources/],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.033855ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/resources/swagger-ui.html],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.039138ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/resources/webjars/],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.033701ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/resources/webjars/springfox-swagger-ui/],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.033644ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/resources/webjars/springfox-swagger-ui/favicon-16×16.png],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.033976ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/resources/webjars/springfox-swagger-ui/springfox.css],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.032818ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/resources/webjars/springfox-swagger-ui/swagger-ui-standalone-preset.js.map],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.04651ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/resources/webjars/springfox-swagger-ui/swagger-ui.css],
]
ts=2019-09-14 21:51:14; [cost=0.034793ms] result=@ArrayList[
@String[META-INF/resources/webjars/springfox-swagger-ui/swagger-ui.js.map],
这下直接看到了具体加载的资源名，这么熟悉的名字：swagger-ui，一个国外的rest接口文档工具，又有国内开发者基于swagger-ui做了一套spring mvc的集成工具，通过注解就可以自动生成swagger-ui需要的接口定义json文件，用起来还比较方便，就是侵入性较强。
删除swagger的jar包后问题，诡异的70+ms就消失了
<!–pom 里删除这两个引用，这两个包时国内开发者封装的，swagger-ui并没有提供java spring-mvc的支持包，swagger只是一个浏览器端的ui+editor –>
<dependency>
<groupId>io.springfox</groupId>
<artifactId>springfox-swagger2</artifactId>
<version>2.9.2</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>io.springfox</groupId>
<artifactId>springfox-swagger-ui</artifactId>
<version>2.9.2</version>
</dependency>
那么为什么swagger会导致请求耗时呢，为什么每次请求偶读会加载swagger内部的静态资源呢？
其实这是tomcat-embed的一个bug吧，下面详细介绍一下该Bug
Tomcat embed Bug分析&解决
源码分析过程实在太漫长，而且也不是本文的重点，所以就不介绍了， 下面直接介绍下分析结果
顺便贴一张tomcat处理请求的核心类图